Share
Print

Call updates
05 February 2025
Published: 07/12/2022
Deadline: 17/09/2024
Available budget:
|
Topic ID |
Types of action |
Budget |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage |
HORIZON-IA |
10,00 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage |
|
|
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
8 |
|
Number of inadmissible proposals |
0 |
|
Number of ineligible proposals |
0 |
|
Number of above-threshold proposals |
7 |
|
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
€34,862,305.41 |
|
Number of proposals retained for funding |
2 |
|
Number of proposals in the reserve list |
2 |
Summary of observer report:
The report refers to the evaluation exercise of the HORIZON-2024-CL6 Second stage call which included 11 different topics and 99 proposals to be assessed. Two independent observers were appointed by REA to monitor the evaluation process from the point of view of its working and execution. The observers analysed the process including the remote individual evaluations and consensus phase. The entire evaluation process was very efficient and executed in a timely manner. The REA staff involved with different roles and responsibilities in the exercise performed very professionally and ensured impartiality, fairness and confidentiality of the evaluation as well as a full compliance with applicable rules. The independent experts appointed by REA to assess the proposals demonstrated high commitment to their tasks and worked hard throughout the entire evaluation. They submitted high quality Individual Evaluation Reports and actively participated in the virtual consensus meetings by thoroughly analysing the various criteria and sub-criteria, thus reaching a genuine consensus. Rapporteurs appointed by REA recorded the views of the experts in coherent Consensus Reports. All reports were submitted on time, thus allowing the successful completion of the exercise. In summary, the evaluation exercise went very well with a high-quality outcome in terms of fair and transparent treatment of each proposal. No issues have been observed.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02_stage2 has closed on the 17/09/2024.
21 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage : 8 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2025
Jul 16, 2024 3:45:29 PM
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Deadline: 22/02/2024
Available budget: EUR 36,000,000.00
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):
|
Topic ID |
Topic short name |
Overall threshold applied |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage |
Demonstrating the potential of Nature-based Solutions and the New European Bauhaus to contribute to sustainable, inclusive and resilient living spaces and communities |
9 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
|
Topic Id |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
Number of inadmissible proposals |
Number of ineligible proposals |
Number of above-threshold proposals |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage |
62 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
Summary of observer report:
This report describes the observers´ assessment of the evaluation of the 1st stage proposals of the two stage calls: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02, HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02 and HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-02. The report analyses the efficiency of the procedures, usability of the instruments (including IT tools), conduct and fairness of the evaluation sessions, and compliance with the applicable rules. The objective is to give independent advice for improving the evaluation processes for EU funding.
The evaluation of the first stage proposals of the three calls involved the assessment of 444 proposals. Overall, 176 independent evaluators were assigned to the first stage evaluations. The fully remote and on-line evaluation was observed to be efficient and appropriate. The briefings and the material sent to experts beforehand was found excellent. In general, the consensus was well reached in SEP with the help of a task comment box. All the proposals were evaluated and treated according to the EU Commission rules and guidelines.
The highest degree of confidentiality was maintained. The evaluation was conducted in full conformity with the published procedures and according to the applicable rules. The compliance with the rules was systematically emphasised during all stages of evaluation. The significance of confidentiality and the conflict of interest were highlighted in several stages of the evaluation. No deviations from these rules and procedures were observed. In general, the entire evaluation was very well organised and executed, and there were no issues which would require strong recommendations. The process was observed to be transparent and fair, and the final scoring and ranking properly reflected the value of the proposals. We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Jun 6, 2024 3:31:54 PM
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Please note that all proposals should incorporate in Part B a table with all their demonstration sites with their NUTS1 locations. The reference table for NUTS1 will be the one from 2021 that was available in Eurostat when the Call was opened. For further information on the NUTS regions please check the Eurostat website and the NUTS1 reference.
Furthermore, main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation:
· Insufficient accompanying indicators or means of measurement made it difficult to clearly assess the achievability of the project objectives in some proposals.
· Circular economy aspects, like circularity, origin and sustainability of materials, eco-design as well as culture and culture heritage links with resilience aspects were not sufficiently elaborated in some proposals.
· Some proposals did not explore sufficiently the connections and possible trade-offs (and propose ways to overcome them) between biodiversity targets in NBS and the NEB, including in what concerns functionality and aesthetics/quality of experience.
· Many proposals did not explicitly mention the NUTS1 regions for each demonstrator/pilot site and did not elaborate sufficiently on the reasoning and complementarity of the geographical coverage.
· In some proposals quantification of the scale and significance of proposal outputs was not sufficiently elaborated.
· In some proposals the link between the proposal outputs and the expected outcomes listed in the call topic was not sufficiently clear.
· In some proposals the contribution to the expected wider impacts of the Destination “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services” of the Horizon Europe Work Programme was not sufficiently elaborated.
· Some proposals did not develop sufficiently how each demonstrator/pilot would go beyond the project lifetime, assuring ownership and sustainability.
· Many proposals did not convincingly describe whether additional or follow-up funding has been sought. Even if mapping funding opportunities in general, the specific actions undertaken/to be undertaken were not sufficiently clarified.
· Several proposals did not clearly detail how they would develop clustering activities with projects of the same topic and other Horizon NBS projects and contribute to the relevant EU initiatives underlined in the call topic, like the NEB Initiative.
· While extensive AI use was planned in some proposals, they did not describe sufficiently how its technical robustness was assured.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
Feb 28, 2024 4:42:00 PM
CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02 has closed on February 22.
136 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
Topic Id Proposals Received
HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage 62
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in June 2023.
Oct 17, 2023 12:00:20 AM
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage(HORIZON-IA)
Demonstrating the potential of Nature-based Solutions and the New European Bauhaus to contribute to sustainable, inclusive and resilient living spaces and communities
TOPIC ID: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02-2-two-stage
Programme: Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON)
Call: Biodiversity and ecosystem services (HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02)
Type of action: HORIZON-IA HORIZON Innovation Actions
Type of MGA: HORIZON Action Grant Budget-Based [HORIZON-AG]
Deadline model: two-stage
Planned opening date: 17 October 2023
Deadline dates: 22 February 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time
17 September 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time
In line with the European Green Deal priorities and the EU climate adaptation strategy, as well as the EU's climate ambition for 2030 and 2050 and the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030, the successful proposals will support the development of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) contributing to the resilience and the sustainable, balanced and inclusive development of urban, peri-urban and rural areas.
The overall aim of this topic and associated R&I activities is to leverage the New European Bauhaus (NEB) core values of sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics in Nature-based Solutions (NBS), in light of a wider transformation to enable a more sustainable, inclusive and resilient society.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of following expected outcomes:
NBS can be an integral part of our living spaces that contribute to our well-being, promote togetherness and connect to our cultural heritage. There is growing evidence that NBS are a valuable entry for transforming behaviour towards sustainability, while contributing with multiple benefits that help communities address different societal challenges – from microclimate regulation to climate change, water management, green job creation, tourism opportunities, urban regeneration, health and well-being.
The NEB aims to make the European Green Deal a positive and tangible experience for citizens, connecting it to our daily lives and living spaces. It is a bridge between the world of science and technology, art and culture and is about leveraging our green and digital challenges to transform our lives and society. By integrating the values of sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics/quality of experience, the NEB supports the development of holistic solutions to global challenges through a place-based, participatory, and transdisciplinary approach.
The systemic integration of social, cultural, digital and nature-based innovation in the design, development and governance of public space has a tremendous potential to transform these spaces into diverse, accessible, safe, inclusive and high-quality areas that increase well-being and health and deliver a fair and equitable distribution of the associated benefits.
It becomes important to analyse the potential of NBS in view of the NEB initiative and conceptualise and demonstrate how to link these two approaches, avoid trade-offs, and enhance synergies and complementarities, through local demonstration. In this regard, proposals should focus on the first transformation of the NEB (places), while also integrating, when possible, the other two transformations (ecosystem of innovation; diffusion of new meanings) in the process.
The successful proposals should:
Proposals should address all of the above points.
For wider impact, proposals should ensure a diversity of demonstration contexts (e.g., urban, rural, protected areas) and geographical representation, as well as the inclusion of a diversity of actors for local demonstration: local and/or regional authorities, business, academia, and civil society.
Other than the critical role of ecological sciences, this topic requires the effective contribution of SSH disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities. The involvement of disciplines such as psychology, behavioural science, economics, geography, anthropology, sociology, architecture, arts, cultural heritage, or design studies, is considered essential to the diffusion of new meanings, enhance social learning and promote the role of social and cultural innovation in transforming public spaces, with particular attention to inclusion, quality of experience and cultural perceptions of nature.
Social innovation is recommended when the solution is at the socio-technical interface and requires social change, new social practices, social ownership, or market uptake.
Because of the substantial investments that might be necessary for implementing the NBS, additional or follow-up funding (private or public) should be sought, including from relevant regional/national schemes under the Recovery and Resilience Fund, the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), or other relevant funds.
Projects should envisage clustering activities with the projects of the same topic and with the Horizon 2020 NBS project portfolio and respective task forces and notably coordinate with Horizon Europe projects resulting from: HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-01-05: Assessing the socio-politics of nature-based solutions for more inclusive and resilient communities; HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage: Developing nature-based therapy for health and well-being; HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-01-03: Network for nature: multi-stakeholder dialogue platform to promote nature-based solutions; and HORIZON-CL6-2023-BIODIV-01-8: Addressing biodiversity decline and promoting Nature-based Solutions in higher education. Collaboration with the European Biodiversity Partnership (Biodiversa+) should also be explored. To this end, proposals should foresee dedicated tasks and appropriate resources for coordination measures, foresee joint activities and joint deliverables.
Proposals should build on existing outcomes of the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe NBS project portfolio and other NEB related projects funded in Horizon Europe and ensure the proposed activities are complementary. Complementarity should also be sought with Horizon Europe Missions, notably “100 Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities by 2030”, “Restore our Ocean and Waters by 2030” and “Adaptation to Climate Change”.
Projects are expected to contribute to the NEB initiative by interacting with the NEB Community, NEBLab and other relevant actions of the NEB initiative through sharing information, best practice, and, where relevant, results.
Proposals should ensure that all evidence, information, and project outputs will be accessible through the Oppla portal (the EU repository for Nature-based solutions).
In the context of this topic, geographical areas of the European Union and Associated Countries are NUTS level 1 regions of European Union Member States and of Associated Countries for which they are defined. In the case of Associated Countries without NUTS classification, the country as a whole is to be considered as one geographical area:
[1]This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

Horizon Europe will incorporate research and innovation missions to increase the effectiveness of funding by pursuing clearly defined targets.
The Commission has engaged policy experts to develop studies, case studies and reports on how a mission-oriented policy approach will work.
Mission areas
5 mission areas have been identified, each with a dedicated mission board and assembly. The board and assembly help specify, design and implement the specific missions which will launch under Horizon Europe in 2021.
Includes cultural and artistic activities that reflect, preserve, and promote cultural identity, heritage, and creative expression.
Focuses on protecting natural ecosystems, promoting sustainable resource management, enhancing climate resilience, and mitigating the impacts of climate change through conservation, adaptation, and low-carbon initiatives.