Provide independent technical review and assurance of CRLP Group 2B site-specific infrastructure designs, ensuring compliance with approved model designs, relevant codes, standards and IPMG requirements. Review engineering calculations, drawings, specifications and BOQs, identify safety and compliance issues, and provide clear recommendations to support safe, practical and context-appropriate infrastructure delivery.
Scope of review
The reviewer will only accept assignments within the technical category and any limits recorded in the approved reviewer roster. Each assignment will be issued in writing and identify the design, project, scope, deliverables, review timeframe and reporting arrangements.
Assignments may include:
site-specific applications of IPMG-approved model designs under CRLP Group 2B;
staged review of the site-specific adaptation where required;
review of design revisions or variations within the approved assignment; and
site verification where desk review cannot confirm critical assumptions.
Calls/meetings with IPMG and (where necessary) with the project teams.
The reviewer must be willing and able to travel within Afghanistan where required, subject to UN security arrangements and medical fitness requirements.
The purpose of the assignment is to provide competent, independent and timely technical assurance that assigned Group 2B site-specific designs:
comply with the approved model-design parameters, applicability guidance and relevant codes and standards;
are supported by sufficient site-specific information and calculations;
are coordinated across drawings, specifications, Bills of Quantities and supporting reports;
are safe, functional, practical to construct and suitable for the Afghan operating context; and
result in a recommendation to accept, return for correction or escalate where the design falls outside the reviewer's authority or approved model envelope.
The reviewer provides independent assurance and does not assume the designer's responsibility.
Independence and assignment acceptance
Review the task assignment and confirm availability, competence and independence before starting work.
Commit to the timeline for the review defined and agreed with IPMG focal point.
Complete the assignment-specific conflict-of-interest declaration.
Decline the assignment where the reviewer prepared, materially supported, supervised or directed the design, or where another actual or perceived conflict exists.
Identify immediately where the design is outside the reviewer's technical category, authority limits or available time.
Technical review
Review design drawings, technical specifications, and BOQs in terms of accuracy and suitability to overall design requirements, identifying aspects where designs do not comply with minimum codes and standards and IPMG policies, and providing practical guidance for design improvement.
Review the design brief, basis of design and applicable codes and standards.
Check the completeness and reliability of site information, including topographic, geotechnical, hydrological, hydraulic, traffic, seismic and environmental inputs as relevant.
Confirm that the approved model design is applicable to the site and that all adaptations remain within the approved limits.
Review calculations, assumptions, load cases, dimensions and material parameters. To ensure the safety, functionality and fitness of infrastructure while recognizing the circumstances and constraints of the UNOPS operational context, the Retainer will be required to apply professional judgment in the application of relevant codes, standards, and IPMG policies.
Check consistency between calculations, drawings, specifications, Bill of Quantities and supporting reports.
Review constructability, maintenance implications and suitability for local materials, skills and operating conditions.
Identify safety-critical omissions, inappropriate assumptions, unresolved interfaces and departures from the approved model design.
Where necessary, recommend additional site investigations, specialist input or escalation to the normal IPMG review route.
Share the review comments with the designated IPMG focal point through official email communication. The IPMG focal point will be responsible for reviewing the comments, discussing them with the retainer where necessary, and subsequently sharing them with the project team.
Review comments and closure
Record clear, specific and actionable review comments using the approved UNOPS format.
Distinguish between safety-critical, compliance, coordination and advisory comments.
Review the designer's responses and revised documents until comments are satisfactorily closed or escalated.
Complete and sign the applicable model-design checklist and the review report. Sign the project review Sign-off certificate provided by IPMG.
Recommend one of the following outcomes: accepted; revise and resubmit; or outside the approved route and to be escalated.
Coordination and site verification
Coordinate with IPMG focal point that will organize any necessary engagement with the project teams.
Attend technical meetings where necessary to explain comments and resolve questions.
Undertake site visits where critical assumptions cannot be confirmed from submitted documents, subject to security and travel approval.
Prepare a concise site-verification note where a visit is undertaken. The note shall be shared with the designated IPMG focal point, who will subsequently share it with the project office.
Provide limited technical guidance to help the designer understand review comments, without taking over design development.
Records and confidentiality
Maintain complete, orderly and traceable review records.
Use the official project and IPMG systems and templates specified for the assignment.
Protect confidential project, partner and design information.
Return all required records and confirm assignment completion before payment approval.
Bridges, Major Drainage, and Structural Works
Relevant experience should include several of the following:
design or independent review of small and medium bridges, larger culverts, causeways or similar crossings;
reinforced-concrete, steel, masonry and foundation design;
bridge loading, seismic effects, abutments, foundations and retaining structures;
hydrology, hydraulic opening, flood level, scour and erosion at crossings; and
structural review of water towers, elevated tanks or similar civil structures.