Share
Print
Call Updates
Jul 25, 2024 2:54:25 PM
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 07.12.2022
Deadline: 11.04.2024
Available budget: EUR 60,000,000
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
The results of the evaluation for the topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage are as follows:
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 27
Number of inadmissible proposals: 0
Number of ineligible proposals: 0
Number of above-threshold proposals: 17
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 138,742,198.95
Number of proposals retained for funding: 7
Number of proposals in the reserve list: 4
Funding threshold[1]: 14
Ranking
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14: 8
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13: 6
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 12: 3
Summary of observers’ report:
Two independent observers were asked to assist the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) in the evaluation of proposals submitted to 9 single and two-stage calls (covering 14 topics) with deadline on 11 April 2024, which were discussed during 2.5 weeks of consensus meetings. They followed the evaluation in order to assess and report on the implementation of the evaluation procedures, on the conduct and fairness of the evaluation process and on the application of the evaluation criteria. Based on the analysis conducted, the observers give independent advice for improvement of the evaluation process.
The evaluation process was fully transparent. The rules and guidelines to be followed were clearly communicated by documents provided to experts, by online and on-site briefings and by instructions given and, where necessary, repeated by the moderators. This ensured a fair and transparent procedure. The evaluation was conducted in an extremely fair and professional way, thanks to a thorough and meticulous preparation and to the helpful and competent HaDEA staff involved, including the quality checkers and the assistant team.
The lump sum method was used in this evaluation. Despite that the budget tables provided detailed information and that guidance was provided, many experts found it challenging assessing the proposed budgets.
The independent observers were impressed by the high quality of the evaluation, and made some further recommendations, for consideration in setting up the rules for the next framework programme. The most important advice is that a higher weight should be assigned to the Excellence criterion. It has at present a weight of 1/3 of the final score. This should be increased, as scientific excellence is the most important factor that determines the quality of a project. Such a change would be in line with international practices.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
[1] Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
Apr 19, 2024 5:55:59 PM
Call HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-two-stage has closed on 11 April 2024.
27 proposals have been submitted under topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage.
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in July 2024 at the earliest.
Feb 13, 2024 12:14:15 PM
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
The proposals should address all the individual sub-criteria in each appropriate section of the proposal (Excellence, Impact, Implementation). E.g., the state of the art should be clearly referenced, the methodology and - where relevant – the technical robustness of AI should be clearly described, the pathways to the expected outcomes and impacts, the scale and significance of project’s contributions to the expected outcomes, and all other aspects need to be addressed.
Aspects such as multidisciplinarity, regional variations, socioeconomics and culture, social sciences and humanities (SSH) should be duly considered and integrated in the methodology. Proposals should ensure that chemical monitoring data are shared in IPCHEM (Information Platform for Chemical Monitoring) through involvement with the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC). Collaboration with JRC, when relevant, should be established after the proposal’s potential approval.
If your proposal contains clinical studies, please read carefully the definition and guidance on the template ‘Information on clinical studies' published on the call page in the Participant Portal (Information on clinical studies (HE)) and remember to upload the template filled in when submitting your proposal.
In order to optimise synergies and increase the impact of the projects, all projects selected for funding from this topic will form a cluster and be required to participate in common networking and joint activities. Without the prerequisite to detail concrete joint activities, proposals should allocate a sufficient budget for the attendance to regular joint meetings and to cover the costs of any other potential common networking and joint activities.
In stage 2 the eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum contribution as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme. To get started, please read lump sum funding and the guide Lump sum funding - what do I need to know, with details on how to complete the Excel workbook. Recommended: Excel 2013 (Windows) / Excel 2016 (Mac OS) or more recent.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of external experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
Jan 29, 2024 6:19:37 PM
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set at 8.5 points for topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget of EUR 60 000 000 (and not below 2.5 times the budget).
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
- Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 90
- Number of inadmissible proposals: 1
- Number of ineligible proposals: 2
- Number of above-threshold proposals: 28
- Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 223 895 509
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact Research Enquiry Service.
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/contact-us/research-enquiry-service_en
Sep 20, 2023 6:44:06 PM
First stage of call HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-two-stage closed on 19 September 2023. 90 proposals were submitted. The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage: 90 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated on 24 January 2024 at the earliest.
Mar 30, 2023 12:00:07 AM
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage(HORIZON-RIA)
The role of environmental pollution in non-communicable diseases: air, noise and light and hazardous waste pollution
TOPIC ID: HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-06-two-stage
Programme: Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON)
Call: Environment and health (Two stage - 2024) (HORIZON-HLTH-2024-ENVHLTH-02-two-stage)
Type of action: HORIZON-RIA HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Type of MGA: HORIZON Lump Sum Grant [HORIZON-AG-LS]
Deadline model: two-stage
Planned opening date: 30 March 2023
Deadline dates: 19 September 2023 17:00:00 Brussels time
11 April 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time
This topic aims at supporting activities that are enabling or contributing to one or several expected impacts of destination 2 ‘Living and working in a health-promoting environment’. To that end, proposals under this topic should aim for delivering results that are tailored towards and contributing to all of the following expected outcomes:
The European Green Deal set out by the European Commission recognises that man-made environmental pollution is an increasing threat for human health and wellbeing. Opinion polls[1] show that climate change, air pollution, and waste are the three most important environmental issues that European citizens are concerned about. Over three-quarters (78%) of respondents believe that environmental issues have a direct effect on their daily life and health.
Pollution affects a large number of people in Europe and beyond: A 2018 assessment attributed 16% of total global mortality to pollution-related disease. Over 7 million people die of exposure to polluted air every year worldwide[2]. For 2019, the European Environment Agency has estimated that around 350 000 premature deaths in the EU can be attributed to air pollution (namely from particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and ozone)[3]. Today, more than 1 in 4 Europeans is exposed to traffic noise levels dangerous to their health in their homes, schools and workplaces[4]. The increase of artificial light at night (ALAN) in cities has altered the natural light levels in the environment and extended human activities to the usually dark hours. It has been estimated that more than 80% of the world population is living under light polluted skies[5]. Waste[6] continues to be a persistent environmental issue in Europe, and it is estimated that there are 2.5 million contaminated sites in Europe, with potentially significant adverse health effects[7].
The global burden from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) has consistently increased over the last decades, being now estimated to account for 70% of deaths globally (World Health Organization). The growing burden of chronic diseases will also be a challenge for Europe’s healthcare systems, these diseases already accounting for an estimated 70-80% of healthcare costs. Currently, around 50 million European citizens suffer from two or more chronic conditions and most of these people are over 65.[8] The most recent WHO environmental burden of disease estimations suggest that, annually, 13% of deaths (630 000) in the WHO Europe region are attributable to environmental stressors and an EEA report concluded that, 90% of deaths attributable to the environment result from non-communicable diseases, including cancers, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mental, behavioural and neurological disorders, diabetes, kidney disease and asthma[9]. While early childhood deaths have declined, the years lived with disability have increased, particularly with chronic disease.
The proposed research should strengthen the knowledge base available to policymakers regarding pollution-disease associations and causal mechanisms at different phases of the life course, taking advantage of latest molecular, cellular and computational technologies to elucidate biological pathways from exposure (including combined exposures) to disease. The work should bring together toxicology, exposure science, public health engineering and environmental epidemiology, and build on data from sources such as pollution-related databases, disease registries, epidemiological studies and biobanks, environmental and human biomonitoring data and new generated data and could consider citizen science and other innovative approaches. All exposure routes should be considered where relevant (oral/digestive tract, inhalation, dermal).
The focus of this topic should be on three areas where the understanding of and evidence on causality should be strengthened to overcome the current paucity of data and respond to calls from policymakers. The applicants should focus on at least one of the following three aspects:
Several of the following activities should be included:
Aspects such as gender, regional variations, socioeconomics and culture should be considered, where appropriate. Proposals should ensure that chemical monitoring data are shared in IPCHEM[12] through involvement with the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC). In that respect, the JRC will collaborate with any successful proposal and this collaboration, when relevant, should be established after the proposal’s approval.
This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.
In order to optimise synergies and increase the impact of the projects, all projects selected for funding from this topic will form a cluster and be required to participate in common networking and joint activities. Without the prerequisite to detail concrete joint activities, proposals should allocate a sufficient budget for the attendance to regular joint meetings and to cover the costs of any other potential common networking and joint activities.
Applicants invited to the second stage and envisaging to include clinical studies should provide details of their clinical studies in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system. See definition of clinical studies in the introduction to this work programme part.
[1] E.g. Eurobarometer 501 – 2020- https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_331
[2]Air pollution (who.int)
[3]For more details, see Briefing no. 19/2021: Health impacts of air pollution in Europe, 2021
[4] EEA 2020 report on Healthy environment, healthy lives: how the environment influences health and well-being in Europe
[5] Evaluating the Association between Artificial Light-at-Night Exposure and Breast and Prostate Cancer Risk in Spain (MCC-Spain Study) | Environmental Health Perspectives | Vol. 126, No. 4 (nih.gov)
[6] https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/waste-and-recycling_en
[7] Data presented at the Ministerial Meeting on Environment and Health, Ostrava, CZ (2017)
[8] European Commission 2020 Report on the Impact of Demographic Change
[9]EEA 2020 report on Healthy environment, healthy lives: how the environment influences health and well-being in Europe
[10]World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345329.
[11]See definition of FAIR data in the introduction to this work programme part.
[12] IPCheM Portal (europa.eu)