Horizon Europe (2021 - 2027)

Increasing the Availability and Use of Non-contentious Inputs in Organic Farming

Last update: Dec 23, 2025 Last update: Dec 23, 2025

Details

Location:EU 27
EU 27
Contracting authority type:Development Institution
Status:Awarded
Budget: EUR 12,000,000
Award ceiling: EUR 6,000,000
Award floor:N/A
Sector:Education, Training & Capacity Building, Environment & Climate, Private Sector & Trade, Agriculture & Rural Development, Marketing & Media
Languages:English
Eligible applicants:Unrestricted / Unspecified
Eligible citizenships:Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, A ...
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Curaçao, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Dem. Rep. Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Commonwealth of, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Eswatini (Swaziland), Ethiopia, Faroe Islands, Fiji, Finland, France, French Polynesia, French Southern Territory, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Greenland, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Caledonia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Korea, North Macedonia, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine / West Bank & Gaza, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Wallis and Futuna, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Date posted: Dec 9, 2022

Attachments 2

Associated Awards

Description

Call updates

29 January 2025

CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS

HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02

EVALUATION results

Published: 07.12.2022

Deadline: 17.09.2024

Available budget: EUR 69.00 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

Topic code

Type of action

Budget

(EUR million)

HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage

IA

12.00



The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:





HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

3

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

Number of ineligible proposals

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

3

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

18.1

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

Number of proposals in the reserve list

1

Funding threshold

12.5

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

2

 

-------------

Summary of observers’ report:

A total of 13 topics (RIA and IA) from four Horizon Europe Cluster 6 calls were evaluated: HORIZON-CL6-2024-COMMUNITIES-02 (2 topics, second stage), HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02 (7 topics, second stage), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CLIMATE-02 (3 topics), and HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-03 (1 topic).

The evaluation was performed entirely online for all topics except one topic which had on-site evaluation in Brussels. All topics followed the standard REA evaluation procedure and complied with the applicable rules. The evaluation ran smoothly, and all deadlines were met. The process was transparent and fair. Individual evaluation reports were clear and complete. Overall, the quality of the consensus reports and the evaluation summary reports was excellent. All experts complied with the requirement to act with independence, impartiality, objectivity, accuracy, and consistency. All experts worked at the highest level of quality and performance. The guidance provided by REA.B2 staff through briefings, documents, and direct consultation, was excellent. The quality of this evaluation was excellent, and it should achieve its purpose of funding only proposals of the highest quality.

-------------

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.


 

17 October 2024
Flash information on proposal numbers

The second stage of HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02 call was closed on 17th September 2024.

31 proposals were submitted in response to the second stage of this call. The breakdown per topic is indicated below:
HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1 (Increasing the availability and use of non-contentious inputs in organic farming): 3 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated between December 2024 and January 2025.


May 28, 2024 3:32:39 PM

 GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1

In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.

Information & tips

Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation:

-        Some proposals failed to clearly demonstrate how they will incorporate knowledge and innovations from previous research projects funded under H2020.

-        The potential barriers that may determine whether the desired outcomes and impacts are achieved were not well identified and/or the mitigation measures were not adequate.

In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.

Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.

Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.


May 25, 2024 9:52:01 AM

CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS

EVALUATION results

Published: 07.12.2022

Deadline: 22.02.2024

Available budget: EUR 69.00 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

Topic code

Type of action

Budget
(EUR million)

HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage

IA

12.00

In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):

  • HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage: 8.0 points

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

 

HORIZON-CL6-2024-F2F-02-1

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

7

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

Number of ineligible proposals

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

3

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR million)

17.99

Summary of observer report:

Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02 has been successful in terms of number of applications. The two-stage blinded evaluation pilot process was explained in the web-briefing to the expert evaluators, with details on the disclosed subject together with the undisclosed name of the applicants. This procedure should credibly prevent any bias in the evaluation. The analysis of the Guide for experts shows that both applicants and experts have full information about scope, rationale, procedures and goals of the HE framework.

The independent observers have access to all guides and topic-specific briefings via the secured EC repository CIRCABC, which was very useful to have all documents related to the different panels at our disposal all the time, and thus facilitated the work.

The information and guidance provided by REA staff covered every aspect of the evaluation. In all documents clear and explicit references to the general rules and laws enforced by the EU Commission were provided.

The first stage evaluation was fully remote and all the evaluation was conducted with impartiality and correctness by both Experts and REA staff.

The opinion of the different experts received equal attention during discussions, and at all times, the experts maintained actions in line with the required independence, impartiality, objectivity, accuracy, and consistency.

In comparison with other national and international evaluation procedures, the quality of the evaluation process was excellent. In fact, the scheme employed in these evaluations is followed by many national agencies.

---

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service. 


Feb 25, 2024 12:05:26 PM

Flash information on the CALL results

(flash call info)

The HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02 call: Fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food systems from primary production to consumption, was closed on 22nd February 2024. 104 proposals were submitted in response to this call.

The breakdown per topic is indicated below:

Topic code

Topic name

Budget
(in million €)

Number of submitted proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage

Increasing the availability and use of non-contentious inputs in organic farming

12.00

7

TOTAL

 

12.00

7

 The evaluation results are expected to be communicated between May-June 2024.


Oct 17, 2023 12:00:24 AM

The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage(HORIZON-IA)


Increasing the availability and use of non-contentious inputs in organic farming

TOPIC ID: HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02-1-two-stage

Programme: Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON)
Call: Fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food systems from primary production to consumption (HORIZON-CL6-2024-FARM2FORK-02)
Type of action: HORIZON-IA HORIZON Innovation Actions
Type of MGA: HORIZON Action Grant Budget-Based [HORIZON-AG]
Deadline model: two-stage
Planned opening date: 17 October 2023
Deadline dates: 22 February 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time
17 September 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time

Topic description
 
ExpectedOutcome:

A successful proposal should support the objective of the farm to fork strategy to transition to fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food systems from primary production to consumption, notably the objective to promote and increase organic farming in Europe, in line with the target of at least 25% of the EU’s agricultural land under organic farming by 2030. Activities will support the implementation of concrete actions in the EU action plan for the development of organic production[1] and of Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on the rules on organic production and labelling of organic products[2]. Activities will also support the farm to fork and biodiversity strategies’ objective to reduce the risk and use of chemical pesticides by 50% and the use of more hazardous pesticides by 50%.

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Increased availability, accessibility and adoption by farmers of cost-efficient alternatives to contentious inputs used in organic farming;
  • Fair, reliable and implementable rules on the use of inputs in organic farming;
  • Significantly reduced environmental impact of practices and input use in organic farming systems and enhanced organic crop and livestock production;
  • Provision of scientific support and recommendations for the development, implementation and evaluation of EU policies and strategies relevant for organic production, in particular on the reduction of contentious inputs as well as on the increased use of alternative products, strategies and solutions;
  • Increased networking and knowledge exchange among all relevant actors for organic farming, contributing to a strengthened research and innovation ecosystem on organic farming in Europe that also supports the spreading of research outcomes to farmers involved in low-input farming and/or agroecological production.
Scope:

Promoting the use of more sustainable farming practices is a policy objective enshrined in the European Green Deal and its related strategies. Boosting organic farming, one of the objectives of the farm to fork and of the EU biodiversity strategies, can greatly contribute to achieving this ambition, and thereby also contributing to climate ambition as, as organic farming contributes directly and significantly to carbon storage in soils and biomass. Moreover, the Commission communication ‘Safeguarding food security and reinforcing the resilience of food systems’[3] highlights the role that organic farming can play in reducing the EU’s dependence on external inputs, since organic farming is recognised, among others, for the limitation in the use of off-farms inputs.

The organic legislation authorises the use of a specific set of products with a lower impact on the environment and on the soil. However, some of these substances have a harmful effect on terrestrial and aquatic species, which calls for the need to replace these substances either by lower impact products or methods or by resistant varieties. It is important to continue exploring ways to phase out and replace contentious inputs used in organic farming, and to increase the availability, accessibility and use of alternatives to these products. In doing so, due attention should be given to system approaches that consider the entire farm system, and its relation with the territorial and landscape levels. Moreover, in order to address farmers’ needs in this specific area, socially innovative solutions are required.

Proposals should develop scientifically robust and transparent methodologies, building on achievements from previous research activities, notably those funded under the Horizon 2020 call ‘SFS-08-2017 - Organic inputs – contentious inputs in organic farming’ (projects Organic-PLUS and RELACS).

Proposals should address all the following activities:

  • Develop, test and put in the place alternative products and solutions, including to the use of copper fungicides, mineral oils, external nutrient inputs (e.g. manure from conventional agriculture, recycled nutrients) in organic plant production, and to the responsible use of anthelmintics, antibiotics and synthetic vitamins used in organic livestock production.
  • Among the alternatives, consider those containing biologically active substances (microorganisms and other naturally occurring substances), invertebrate biological control agents, (micro)biological agents for soil amelioration or cultivation techniques, and considering effective functional biodiversity systems.
  • Building on existing demonstration sites and experiments where available and relevant, test the alternatives and, if relevant, their combinations.
  • Further develop toolboxes, strategies and technologies for the minimisation or phasing-out of the use of contentious inputs in organic farming.
  • Demonstrate the safety of the alternatives, in line with the EU regulatory framework related to their placing on the market, and generate data to enable the registration of the alternatives.
  • Deepen analysis and produce data on the efficacy, resource efficiency, climate and environmental impacts of the alternatives developed, compared to the contentious inputs they are to replace. This should include analysis of impact on non-target species and on human health.
  • Analyse farmers’ and consumers’ acceptance of the alternatives developed and consider new governance models/relations among food chain actors. This should include the development of business plans, with the support of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), and assessment of stakeholders’ (farmers, policymakers, researchers, advisors, companies, consumers, etc.) perspectives and needs to improve already existing policy instruments to reduce the use of contentious inputs and increased availability of alternatives.
  • Set up demonstration sites that are representative of the diversity of organic farming systems in Europe, to promote participatory activities, and the exchange of knowledge and best practices among farmers.
  • Develop training packages targeted to farmers and other actors of the organic agri-food chain, and awareness raising activities towards citizens and consumers, engaging with existing initiatives where relevant.

Proposals must implement the 'multi-actor approach’ and ensure adequate involvement of the main stakeholders involved in finding alternatives to the use of contentious inputs used in organic farming (farmers, breeders, researchers, advisors, industry, etc.). Proposals should cover contentious inputs used in a range of organically-grown crops (in- and out-door), both arable and perennial, as well as the organic livestock sector. Sectors with high economic relevance in different pedo-climatic conditions and various biogeographical regions should be targeted in a representative way. Proposals should include a dedicated task, appropriate resources and a plan on how they will collaborate with other projects funded under this topic, and ensure coherence and synergy with other relevant activities carried out under other initiatives in Horizon Europe, including under the topic HORIZON-CL6-2023-GOVERNANCE: ‘Developing an EU advisory network on organic agriculture’, HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE: ‘Organic farming thematic network to compile and share knowledge ready for practice’ and the future partnership ‘Accelerating farming systems transition: agroecology living labs and research infrastructures’.

To ensure trustworthiness, swift and wide adoption by user communities, and to support EU and national policymakers, actions should adopt high standards of transparency and openness, going beyond ex-post documentation of results and extending to aspects such as assumptions, benchmarks, models and data quality during the life of projects.

Concrete efforts shall be made to ensure that the data produced in the context of this topic is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable), particularly in the context of real-time data feeds, exploring workflows that can provide “FAIR-by-design” data, i.e., data that is FAIR from its generation.

Specific Topic Conditions:

Activities are expected to achieve TRL 7-8 by the end of the project – see General Annex B.

[1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0141R%2801%29

[2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32018R0848

[3]https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/key_policies/documents/safeguarding-food-security-reinforcing-resilience-food-systems.pdf

 
 
 
 
 
Want to unlock full information?
Member-only information. Become a member to access this information. Procurement notices from over 850+ sources of tenders and grants published by donors, development banks, foundations, and international financial institutions (IFIs) are available here.