Share
Print
Call updates
Jun 6, 2024 2:12:05 PM
SEALS OF EXCELLENCE
As indicated in the Work Programme, "Seals of Excellence will be awarded to applications exceeding all of the evaluation thresholds set out in this work programme, but cannot be funded due to lack of budget available to the call".
13 proposals qualify and will therefore receive a Seal of Excellence in maximum 72 hours.
May 31, 2024 11:17:14 AM
EVALUATION results
Call publication: 07/12/2022
Amendment publication date: 27/10/2023
Opening date: 10/01/2023
Deadline date: 07/03/2024
Total call budget: EUR 174.000.000,00
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage (single topic call) |
|
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
34 |
Number of inadmissible proposals |
1 |
Number of ineligible proposals |
0 |
Number of above-threshold proposals |
28 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
EUR 397.448.730,00 |
Number of proposals retained for funding |
12 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list |
3 |
Funding threshold (NB: proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions)). |
12.5 |
Ranking distribution |
|
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 |
3 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 |
4 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 |
21 |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the 33 eligible second stage proposals submitted in response to the call HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01 was performed between 19 March and 3 May 2024. Each of these complex and multidisciplinary proposals was evaluated by 5 independent evaluators in a hybrid mode (remote individual evaluation phase, followed by an on-site consensus phase in Brussels).
The evaluation was thorough, performed in full transparency and impartiality, with fair and equal treatment of all proposals, and in full compliance with the applicable general Horizon Europe rules as well as with specific rules for the call. The evaluation was performed with the participation of 48 evaluators and 8 rapporteurs, moderated by 7 REA project officers, under the supervision and permanent guidance of the REA call coordination team.
The end result of the evaluation is a rank list of proposals, agreed by all participants, where the 12 best proposals selected for funding, within the available budget limits, have been clearly identified. All applicants will be informed shortly about the outcome of the evaluation and the grant preparation phase will start over the summer 2024 for the successful applicants
All participants appeared to be satisfied with the hybrid mode selected for this evaluation, in particular with the return of the consensus phase in Brussels with face-to-face consensus meetings, 4 years after the covid outbreak.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Mar 8, 2024 10:08:29 PM
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01 (stage 2) has closed on the 07/03/2024.
34 proposals have been submitted.
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in June 2024.
Jul 24, 2023 11:53:10 AM
The evaluation of the first-stage proposals submitted in response to the call HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01 (first-stage) was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’, in accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme.
The threshold for each criteria was 4 points. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget): 8.5 points.
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 125
Number of inadmissible proposals: 0
Number of ineligible proposals: 1
Number of withdrawn proposals: 1
Number of above-threshold proposals: 47
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 662,745,625.00
Number of proposals invited to stage-two: 35
Total budget requested for proposals invited to stage-two: EUR 494,770,625.00
We will inform shortly the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information for preparing the full proposal.
Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation (from successful proposals):
EXCELLENCE
Strategic vision:
● too broadly defined, scope and ambitions too wide-reaching and insufficiently focused
● state-of-the-art not suitably referenced; advancement beyond the state-of-the-art not convincingly demonstrated
● novel and innovative aspects not sufficiently highlighted
● approaches to achieving the stated goals not properly defined
Challenges:
● specific challenges for both the research discipline and/or the region not fully discussed
● some proposals address either scientific or operational challenges, but not both
Human resources:
● staff recruitment and retention approaches not appropriately addressed
● lack of concrete and attractive incentives to recruit and retain staff
Autonomy:
● insufficient information provided to demonstrate autonomy
● decision-making mechanisms, distribution of responsibilities, management bodies and independence from existing structure(s) not adequately addressed
Synergies:
● existing or potential synergies with EU/national/regional funds and policies not clearly or sufficiently identified
● no adequate description of how projects will work with or add value to policy instruments
Objectives:
● measurability of the objectives often not assured
● no or insufficient number of suitable indicators (KPIs) to verify achievement
● objectives not sufficiently linked to subsequent actions and activities
Partnership:
● interaction and mutual benefits between coordinator and advanced partner(s) not always appropriately described
● engagement and commitment of the advanced partner(s) not fully demonstrated
IMPACT
Requirements, barriers, mitigations:
● inadequate analysis of barriers to impact achievement
● lack of well-defined and robust mitigation measures
Long-term self-sustainability:
● insufficiently convincing plans for long-term sustainability
● insufficient leverage of business opportunities / IP exploitation
In the stage 2 evaluation, successful proposals will have the chance to address or clarify these issues:
- Full proposals will be evaluated more in-depth and by an extended group of independent experts
- Full proposals must be consistent with the stage-one proposal; and shall NOT differ substantially
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Jul 5, 2023 12:28:16 PM
The evaluation of the call HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01 (first-stage) is finalised. Applicants will be informed towards the end of July 2023.
Apr 12, 2023 8:48:57 PM
The call HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01 (first-stage) has closed. A total of 125 proposals have been submitted. The submissions details are as follows:
Submitted - 125
Draft - 63
Deleted - 89
Withdrawn - 2
Total: 279
Jan 10, 2023 9:28:40 AM
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage(HORIZON-CSA)
Teaming for Excellence
TOPIC ID: HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage
Programme: Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON)
Call: Teaming for Excellence (HORIZON-WIDERA-2023-ACCESS-01)
Type of action: HORIZON-CSA HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Type of MGA: HORIZON Action Grant Budget-Based [HORIZON-AG]
Deadline model: two-stage
Planned opening date: 10 January 2023
Deadline dates:
12 April 2023 17:00:00 Brussels time
07 March 2024 17:00:00 Brussels time
Disparities in R&I performance are due to, among other reasons, the insufficient critical mass of science and lack of centres of excellence having sufficient competence to engage countries and regions strategically in a path of innovative growth. Teaming is responding to this challenge establishing new centres of excellence or modernising existing ones with the help of leading EU or AC partnering institutions. This will help countries to increase their R&I intensity and to attain a competitive position in the European R&I system and globally, especially by becoming drivers of change.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
Teaming is one of the actions that stimulates the European Union to exploit its potential by maximising and spreading the benefits of research and innovation. It is vital for its competitiveness and its ability to address societal challenges.
The Teaming action is designed to support the creation of new centres of excellence or upgrading the existing ones in low R&I performing countries (except those centres of excellence that have already benefitted from previous Teaming calls). It is building on partnerships between leading scientific institutions in the European landscape and the main beneficiary institutions in low R&I performing countries that display the willingness to engage together for this purpose. This can help countries that are lagging behind in terms of research and innovation performance attaining a competitive position in the global value chains. Leading scientific institutions are advanced and established partners that have developed an outstanding reputation in research and innovation excellence in the chosen scientific domain. Institutions that are still in the process of development or modernisation, e.g., those that are still receiving support as coordinators from widening actions under Horizon 2020, are normally not considered leading institutions, unless a proper justification is provided in the proposal.
In order to maximise impact of research and innovation on society, environment and economy at large and to contribute in particular to the achievement of the European Union’s objectives, funding must be coherent and work in synergy. This notion is highly relevant for Teaming action, where a complementary source of funding from a national (or regional or European or private source) is required. The implementation of Teaming action is expected to become an influential and meaningful bridge particularly between smart specialisation strategies and excellence in R&I with the aim of strengthening the European Research Area and contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals.
Whatever the source of the required complementary source of funding, a Teaming project, as a notable flagship in its host country, exemplifies not only the achievements in R&I, capacity building or competitiveness, but also sets and facilitates synergies in practice.
The evaluation of the complementary source of funding part may use additional criteria required by, where relevant, the Cohesion Policy programmes and/or legislation. The managers of the complementary funding should apply to the operations the categories, maximum amounts and methods of calculation of eligible costs established under Horizon Europe. In addition, they should be able to apply Art.25 (d) of the revised General Block Exemption Regulation.
Proposals may be evaluated by an additional panel of experts with specific knowledge on complementary funding sources.
In the first stage of evaluation the R&I excellence and the conceptual approach for the centres of excellence will be evaluated. Applicants should present a strategic vision on how to develop R&I excellence beyond the state of the art in the chosen domain and on how the co-ordinator will benefit from the partnership with a leading institution from abroad. In addition, the conceptual approach should outline how the access to complementary funding from other sources will be ensured, in the respect of national, regional and/or European strategies or policy priorities (e.g., notably smart specialisation strategies, Green Deal, Digital transformation). Proposals also should sketch out briefly how the autonomy of the envisaged centre will be ensured and the necessary human resources recruited and retained.
Proposals invited to the second stage must include an investment plan for the full project including a binding commitment for the necessary complementary funding.
At a detailed level the full proposal should:
Proposals should illustrate quantitatively and qualitatively the expected potential impact of the project and its expected results in terms of new local and international research and innovation partnerships, institutional and/or R&I system changes (various levels), increased research intensity (i.e. new scientific publications directly linked to the project’s area, protected IPR). Proposals are encouraged to choose any additional relevant indicators that will be used for measuring the impacts achieved.
Specific attention should be paid to gender equality objectives, in line with the organisations’ commitments through their adopted gender equality plans, and in line with European Research Area objectives.
[1] This can be considered under the category of ‘other goods, works and services’