Share
Print
Call Updates
Sep 13, 2022 5:16:09 PM
New versions of detailed budget table for EDF RA.
Correction of formulas for participation of SMEs and mid-caps in the sheet Info Award criterion 5 (see tab "history of changes" in the file for more details).
Jun 21, 2022 3:52:14 PM
The submission session is now available for: EDF-2022-RA-UWW-UTS(EDF-RA)
Jun 10, 2022 3:24:36 PM
Hyperlinks to documents in Topic conditions and documents have been updated.
Underwater manned-unmanned teaming and swarms
TOPIC ID: EDF-2022-RA-UWW-UTS
Programme: European Defence Fund
Work programme part: EDF-2022
Call: Research actions through actual costs grants following the call for proposals (EDF-2022-RA)
Work programme year: EDF-2022
Type of action: EDF-RA EDF Research Actions
Type of MGA: EDF Action Grant Budget-Based [EDF-AG]
Deadline model: single-stage
Planned opening date: 21 June 2022
Deadline date: 24 November 2022 17:00:00 Brussels time
General objective
This topic addresses research for future capabilities addressing moving subsurface threats using manned-unmanned teaming and swarm technologies, possibly including surface and air platforms and components, particularly in confined and shallow waters (CSW). This System-of-Systems (SoS) should enable enhanced operational efficiency and performance. The actions in this topic should address state-of-the-art, and beyond, swarm control solutions. This includes analysis of centralised, distributed, and hybrid control models. Swarm control may employ control scheme with a global or local approach and their optimised combination. The control-scheme should adopt to mission type changes as the operation evolves from one phase to another. Guidance and control strategies for the swarm are also to be considered, where inductive and swarm internal cognitive-like self-control needs to be analysed.
Specific objective
The aim is to develop swarming technologies up to at least TRL 4 and validated in seawater. The expected result of the research activities performed with the support of this call is a better mission performance result than the one obtained by an individual UxV or platform alone. This should take into account data sources of opportunity. The main challenges or factors to be solved to enable this are the following:
Scope and types of activities
Scope
The proposal for research on swarm aspects of unmanned systems and the collaboration policies that govern it, performing underwater missions, in CSW, shall address, among others, the following aspects:
(1) Mission or task-based performance by the swarm and all its components. The definition, and management of the collaborative system, dependent on the architecture defined, will aim to optimize the use of every individual to better obtain the common objective. This will require planning and control with a focus on at least the following:
a. Coordination and cooperation inside the system to share a defined space/environment and also the information obtained. Interoperability of the system within a defined architecture (centralized/decentralized).
b. Adjust to changes in the environment and optimise accordingly, while maintaining mission objective.
c. The cooperation of heterogeneous vehicles will involve the integration of a large amount information provided by different sensors.
d. The information obtained about the environment or operation must be combined, analysed and disseminated in real time in order to provide feedback to the system through interoperability standards, which should be consistent with relevant NATO standards.
e. Communication: A Shared link between vehicle and control station must be robust and reliable. Relevant protocols, such as JANUS underwater communications protocol must be taken into consideration.
f. Providing the HMI-infrastructure to control the system, taking into account different levels of autonomy.
g. The definition of the behaviour model of every individual inside the system and of different swarm collaborative models, e.g.: One mission shared by the platforms of the swarm; or swarm split in two or more squads with their own missions
(2) Participation of vehicles with different characteristics: The use of different platforms will allow the use of different capacities taking into account several aspects such as:
a. Level of autonomy and combinations of different levels;
b. Movement (kinetic) characteristics;
d. Types of platforms (UUV, USV, sonobuoys, gliders etc.);
e. Enabling systems installed such as detect and avoid (DAA) systems (below and on the surface);
f. Command, Control, and Communication Systems;
g. In-swarm localisation, communication and coordination;
h. Payloads, such as sensors and effectors.
The proposed solution must give due consideration to the need to cooperate with other platforms to achieve a common goal (interoperability, information processing, security in operation, communication, detect and avoid, etc.). The resulting cooperation policies need to integrate all the existing with the new challenges arising from this kind of operation.
The proposal must give due consideration to techniques of cooperation between unmanned autonomous systems when acting as a swarm, namely task allocation/mission/route optimisation algorithms. Other, novel methods are also encouraged and invited to this topic.
Proposals that envisage unmanned and autonomous systems to work together as a squad -rather than as a swarm- (i. e each system/platform is performing a different task) are also welcome. Then the task allocation problem must be solved as well as the automatic re-tasking of the whole squad or group and each single unmanned asset. It should then also propose a solution for the automatic reconfiguration of the squad. The method of hierarchical task networks, or the method of intelligent software agents for implementing cooperation between systems/platforms can be used, but any other, alternative method can also be proposed.
An analysis and the elaboration of policies of cooperation between unmanned systems (swarming) should be described in detail in the proposal.
Appropriate level of human control must be respected also in proposals containing solutions with autonomous features.
The proposal should address SoS architecture, control, and guidance solutions of unmanned systems (swarming) and/or unmanned and manned systems in the underwater domain. This includes:
Types of activities
The following types of activities are eligible for this topic:
Types of activities (art 10(3) EDF Regulation) |
Eligible? |
|
(a) |
Activities that aim to create, underpin and improve knowledge, products and technologies, including disruptive technologies, which can achieve significant effects in the area of defence (generating knowledge) |
Yes (mandatory) |
(b) |
Activities that aim to increase interoperability and resilience, including secured production and exchange of data, to master critical defence technologies, to strengthen the security of supply or to enable the effective exploitation of results for defence products and technologies (integrating knowledge) |
Yes (mandatory) |
(c) |
Studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of new or upgraded products, technologies, processes, services and solutions |
Yes (mandatory) |
(d) |
Design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the definition of the technical specifications on which such design has been developed, including partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment |
Yes (optional) |
(e) |
System prototyping of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology (prototype) |
No |
(f) |
Testing of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology |
No |
(g) |
Qualification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology |
No |
(h) |
Certification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology |
No |
(i) |
Development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies |
No |
The proposals must include generating knowledge, integrating knowledge, and studies activities. The proposal may include design activities.
The proposals must substantiate synergies and complementarity, while avoiding duplication, with concepts and architectures developed in complementary ongoing European work streams and projects where relevant.
The following tasks must be performed as part of the required activities:
Functional requirements
The solution should enable swarm configuration optimisation taking into account mission and task, resources, environment, military scenario and threat.
The swarm, sub-swarm, individual and node control solutions should enable obstacle detection and avoidance, reconfiguration in case of failure of individuals or nodes, behaviour in case of loss of communication.
The solution should facilitate swarm control and guidance for swarm sizes up to several hundreds of individuals in multiple sub-swarm configurations.
The solutions should enable mission performance with loss of individuals, communication and control.
The solution should enable functionality in GNSS degraded and cyber contested environment.
The solution should enable in-swarm localisation and coordination. The solution should be interoperable with existing standards when relevant, including NATO standards.
Collaborative systems composed by multi domain platforms (UUV, USV, sonobuoys, gliders, etc.) operating together may face several challenges. The solution should enable:
It is expected that the outcome should: