The Future of Farming: Can AI and Drones Save Agriculture - or Destroy It? | DevelopmentAid Dialogues

By DevAid Dialogues

The Future of Farming: Can AI and Drones Save Agriculture - or Destroy It? | DevelopmentAid Dialogues

At a crossroads, modern agriculture must strike a balance between environmental sustainability, economic growth, and food security. Hisham Allam, host of DevelopmentAid Dialogues, recently spoke with agricultural experts Brian Anderson and Kyle Newell about how new farming methods and regulations are creating a sustainable future.

Brian, an agricultural economist, and Kyle, who has extensive experience working with smallholder farmers in Africa, shared ideas on empowering farmers, utilizing technology, and creating resilient agricultural systems.

Download the transcript of this episode.

Kyle underlined the need for straightforward, doable concepts, particularly for farmers in the Global South.

“The simplest solutions are frequently the best in the Global South,” he stated.

By focusing on basic needs and developing tools that align with farmers’ everyday challenges, he and his team have pushed for more beneficial agricultural innovations.

Brian described the development of precision agriculture, which uses data to increase farming output, from a technology perspective.

“We’ve talked about precision farming for decades, but only now is the technology becoming accessible,” he stated.

He did point out, though, that contemporary technology like drones and the Internet of Things are often unsuitable, especially on smaller farms.

“We need to make sure the technology is scalable and useful on the ground,” he stated.

Smallholder farmers, who produce 80% of the world’s food, are critical to ensuring food security. Kyle explained that, while these farmers contribute significantly to the world food supply, they frequently work with little resources and outmoded tools.

“In many emerging markets, the agricultural workforce is vast—yet the resources are minimal,” he remarked, underlining the need for stronger policies and investments.

One difficulty is how to boost production without displacing employees. Kyle proposed a balanced approach:

“The goal is to increase productivity while keeping people employed in agriculture,” he stated.

This balance is especially critical in areas where agriculture is the primary source of income and high-tech investments are sometimes prohibitively expensive.

Although switching to these approaches may initially cut yields, they eventually make farms more robust.

Brian noted that shifting consuming habits are also necessary for resilience.

“Eating lower on the food chain and reducing food waste are big steps,” he said.

He underlined that when these adjustments are made collectively, they can lessen the negative environmental effects of food production, particularly in wealthy nations with high rates of food waste.

Kyle and Brian emphasized the necessity for scalability even though cutting-edge technologies have the potential to completely transform agriculture.

“Tractors are still considered a luxury in some parts of the world,” Brian said.

He supports little, reasonably priced innovations that can result in significant productivity gains rather than high-tech fixes.

“Basic mechanization sometimes makes the biggest difference,” he continued.

Technology also helps with data-driven decision-making, which promotes sustainable agriculture. According to Brian, “data helps farmers make more accurate input-output decisions, which increases efficiency and sustainability.” However, he underlined that to guarantee that these technologies are applied successfully across the agricultural spectrum, education is essential.

Kyle and Brian concurred that the advancement of sustainable agriculture depends on government policies. Kyle stated that while ethical and fair trade methods are important, smallholder farmers need workable, cost-effective alternatives that don’t involve expensive certificates. Small farmers run the danger of falling behind as global agriculture develops without these.

International cooperation is key to leveling the playing field, particularly for farmers in developing regions. Kyle pointed out that smaller governments often lack influence in global policy decisions, despite bearing the brunt of climate challenges.

“We need the voices of smallholder farmers at the policy table,” he said, emphasizing that sustainable development must include the perspectives of those on the front lines.

Looking forward, Kyle and Brian envision a world where sustainable practices are standard and accessible to all. Brian highlighted the potential of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs and alternative proteins in fostering sustainable consumption.

“CSA reconnects people with their food source, building respect for the process,” he said.

“In agriculture, listening is key.” “Solutions work best when they’re shaped by those who know the land, Kyle concluded.”

His advice encapsulates an important aspect of sustainable agriculture: an approach that stresses listening, adaptation, and respect for both the land and its stewards.

For listeners interested in the transformative role of agriculture in sustainable development, Kyle Newell and Brian Anderson’s insights offer a powerful perspective on the intersection of innovation, policy, and community engagement in reshaping global food systems.

Listen to our latest podcast for an in-depth look at how agricultural practices are evolving to meet the challenges of food security, environmental conservation, and economic resilience in diverse communities around the world.