World Rural Development Day: challenges and opportunities (Part I) | Expert's Opinions

Rural development has the goal of increasing the quality of life and economic well-being for those living in rural areas, who many times find themselves in isolation and precarious conditions. Aside from that, rural development is key for reducing the gaps between villages and cities, contributing to food security, poverty reduction, and the preservation of cultural heritage. By creating workplaces and attracting investments in infrastructure, rural development is at the core of development for every country. However, in practice, limited access to education and healthcare, unemployment, climate vulnerability, and inadequate infrastructure continue to affect the rural population worldwide. Today, as the world marks World Rural Development Day, take a moment to reflect on this issue and read experts’ opinions in this regard.

DevelopmentAid: What are the most overlooked challenges faced by rural communities today?

“The commonly known challenges in rural communities include poverty, depopulation, limited access to education and healthcare, unemployment, climate vulnerability, and inadequate infrastructure. This leaves other problems, such as rural-urban migration, an imposed development agenda, and the underexploitation of rural resources, unaddressed. According to Michael Todaro (an economist who studied the issue in detail), urban bias remains a major challenge for migrants moving from villages to cities in search of jobs and a better quality of life. The economic disparity and inequality between rural and urban dwellers are major root causes of these movements. As a result, most families now live far apart, destroying their social fabric and family bonds. Moreover, rural-urban migration has resulted in high dependency ratios in most villages, as the working-age population abandons their villages, leaving the young (most below 15 years) and retirees to fend for themselves. Nowadays, the middle-aged lack a sense of ownership and connection to their village roots as a result of urban bias. Beyond a lack of ownership, international development partners have been imposing development agendas. Rural communities have no final say over development priorities that reflect their wishes and needs. The focus has been on infrastructure projects based on external experts’ “one-size-fits-all” studies and proposed solutions. Additionally, there is less focus on empowering rural populations with ideas and knowledge. Rural residents lack capacity-building to sustainably exploit and utilize natural resources in their villages to support economic development and poverty alleviation.”

“Having worked with farming communities, cooperatives, women’s groups, and local governments across Tanzania and internationally, I believe the most overlooked challenge is the limited transformation of rural economies beyond primary production. While considerable resources are invested in increasing agricultural yields, many rural households still struggle to convert production gains into sustainable income because they lack access to finance, value addition opportunities, reliable markets, and rural enterprises. Climate change is further intensifying existing vulnerabilities. In both East Africa and Southeast Asia, I have witnessed how irregular rainfall patterns, floods, and declining soil productivity can quickly erode years of development gains. At the same time, many young people are leaving rural areas because they do not see agriculture as a pathway to prosperity. The challenge is therefore not simply improving agricultural output. It is creating diversified and resilient rural economies that provide decent employment, encourage entrepreneurship, and enable people to build dignified livelihoods within their communities.”

“In northern Benin, rural challenges are no longer limited to monetary poverty. One of the most underestimated problems is unequal access to essential, quality services, including education, healthcare, digital access, and basic infrastructure. In several rural communes of Atacora, Alibori, and Borgou (Benin), young people still travel long distances to access training centers or specialized care. According to the World Bank, nearly 45% of Benin’s population lives in rural areas, heavily reliant on rain-fed agriculture, which is particularly vulnerable to climate change. Another often-overlooked challenge is the gradual erosion of economic prospects for rural youth. The lack of decent jobs encourages migration to urban centers or neighboring countries. Added to this are the effects of insecurity and climate pressure in the northern border areas, which further weaken social cohesion and the livelihoods of rural communities.”

“Most of the rural population in the developing world is linked to agriculture; however, the majority of the agricultural activities are based on subsistence, rain-fed agriculture, with limited connection to markets. The challenges smallholder farmers (SHFs) face are related to:

• land tenure, which discourages them from long-term investments, e.g., irrigation;
• lack of financial capacity and assistance due to an inability to provide acceptable collateral;
• customary laws that deprive the rights of women, overruling national legislation;
  limited access to inputs and markets, in particular for communities in remote locations;
• lack of knowledge, stagnation in traditional habits;
• limited access to extension services;
• lack of self-confidence and will to transform from subsistence to commercial farming.”

“A major but often overlooked challenge is the exclusion of rural communities from long-term, context-specific planning, which is only possible with unwavering commitment to a decentralised development approach. Most countries lack village-level policies, leaving out the most critical development needs of at-risk rural groups such as those in isolated, conflict-affected, or climate-risk areas. Without microplanning systems such as village-specific targets, most rural development initiatives remain unsustainable and often rely on assumptions.”

“One of the most overlooked challenges faced by rural communities today is the lack of value-added economic activities. Many rural areas still depend heavily on raw commodity production without access to processing industries, modern infrastructure, financing, or stable market connections. As a result, young people continue migrating to urban areas in search of better opportunities.”

“I note that one of the most overlooked challenges facing rural communities today is not simply poverty, but economic isolation. In many countries, rural producers remain disconnected from finance, markets, storage, processing, technology, and reliable infrastructure. As a result, even productive farmers and rural enterprises struggle to generate sustainable incomes. In addition, climate change is intensifying these challenges through increased weather variability, degraded natural resources, and greater production risks.”

DevelopmentAid: What are the long-term consequences of depopulation and economic decline in rural communities?

“A common saying goes, “there is strength in numbers.” Research by many economists has shown a positive correlation between large population size and high economic development, with China as a case study. A continuous decline in rural population and economic capacity in villages will trigger negative consequences in the future: First, some villages are likely to become “ghost villages” due to the ongoing exodus (migration) of the working-age population from rural areas to cities. This decline in the rural population will lead to many abandoned, unmaintained buildings and dilapidated infrastructure. Second, the less densely populated rural areas will have isolated homesteads, leading to social isolation, reduced social exchange and interaction, and the erosion of unity and social fabric, which in turn cause depression and shorter lifespans among older rural residents (the majority of whom are lonely retirees). Third, most of the rural depopulation results from rural-urban migration. The remaining population is highly dependent on support from the urban labour force. Rural areas attract less investment due to limited capital circulation, low-wealth residents, and inadequate enablers for business growth. The abandoned villages with low economic value make it difficult for indigenous residents to mobilise resources for local business and infrastructure investment.”

“Throughout my work in rural development programmes, one recurring trend has been the steady migration of young people from rural areas to towns and cities. While migration can create opportunities, sustained out-migration often leaves rural communities with an ageing workforce, reduced labour availability, and fewer entrepreneurs capable of driving local economic growth. Over time, declining populations can weaken local markets, reduce demand for services, and make it difficult to maintain schools, healthcare facilities, and community institutions. In agricultural communities, labour shortages can also affect productivity and limit the adoption of new technologies and farming practices. The consequences extend beyond rural areas. Weak rural economies can contribute to food insecurity, increase pressure on urban infrastructure, and widen inequalities between regions. My experience in Tanzania, Vietnam, and Europe has shown that rural communities remain vibrant when they are connected to markets, infrastructure, finance, and employment opportunities. Where these investments are absent, economic decline and depopulation often reinforce one another, creating a cycle that becomes increasingly difficult to reverse.”

“The gradual depopulation of rural areas has profound economic and social consequences. In northern Benin, the mass exodus of young people to cities or abroad reduces the availability of agricultural labor and weakens local economies. In the long term, this threatens food security, even though agriculture represents approximately 30% of Benin’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and is the main source of income for rural households. Rural economic decline also leads to a deterioration of social services. Schools close or lack teachers, health centers become underutilized, and public investment gradually decreases. This situation exacerbates territorial inequalities and increases the sense of abandonment among rural populations. Furthermore, the loss of local knowledge related to agriculture, natural resource management, and traditional solidarity mechanisms poses a significant risk to community resilience in the face of the growing climate and security crises in the Sahel region.”

“The conditions of the rural population due to the challenges, some of which were mentioned above, lead many to abandon their households and migrate to large cities in search of new opportunities. This involves the driving force of development—the youth. The long-term consequences are twofold: cities become congested; the rate of affordable housing does not meet migration demand, which is limited in financial resources; road infrastructure, water supply, and wastewater management capacity does not meet the population expansion; and slums pop up like mushrooms. On the other hand, the average age of the rural population is increasing, with fewer incentives and will to change and transform to better livelihoods; overall, stagnation remains and is likely to expand.”

“Depopulation and economic decline in rural areas widen disparities in access to essential services, deepening cycles of deprivation. Rural communities are also vulnerable to the unintended costs of national growth, such as increased flood impacts due to upstream urban expansion. Moreover, lack of integrated, community-focused planning is a major reason why rural poverty persists. Most development initiatives in rural areas remain fragmented and sectionalized, addressing isolated issues without considering how to deliver them as a single package. This piecemeal approach limits the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions, making it difficult to achieve lasting improvements in livelihoods, infrastructure, and well-being.”

“In the long term, rural depopulation weakens local food systems, reduces agricultural productivity, and creates deeper economic inequality between urban and rural regions. It can also increase pressure on cities through overcrowding and unemployment.”

“The long-term consequences of rural depopulation are significant. When young people leave in search of opportunities elsewhere, rural areas lose entrepreneurship, skills, and investment potential. Agricultural productivity stagnates, local businesses decline, and communities become increasingly dependent on government support and remittances. Over time, this weakens food security and reduces the economic resilience of entire regions.”

DevelopmentAid: How can international development partners improve their support for rural transformation?

“As we reflect on the lessons learned from the challenges and their long-term consequences, the international development partners are advised to consider the following recommendations to improve rural communities:

• Ensuring that pre-investment grassroots consultations in rural communities, rather than feasibility studies, inform the stakeholders’ engagement plan for project implementation. The consensus voice of the rural population should have the final say on preferred development, not experts’ ideas imposed by multilateral development agencies.
• Encouraging full project ownership by rural residents through all-inclusive stakeholder participation, and by contractors via CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), which should be mandatory as part of contractual obligations.
• Focusing on closing rural residents’ knowledge and idea gaps in innovation and technology, business, and poverty alleviation through service or high-productivity agriculture.
• Including development funds for knowledge transfer, capacity building, ownership and sustainability, and value-addition infrastructure (i.e., training in post-harvest handling, food preservation in agricultural silos, and processing and packaging).
• Funding projects that reverse the rural communities’ push factors, i.e., value-chain and manufacturing of final products to create jobs in rural areas.
• Training rural entrepreneurs in marketing, distribution, inventory control, transaction processing, and worker motivation to boost productivity and create jobs.
• Including compulsory social amenities, i.e., recreational centres, as part of infrastructure development to address the challenges posed by social fabric decay in some depopulated rural areas.”

“From my experience managing programmes in rural finance, value chain development, climate-resilient agriculture, and community empowerment, the most effective interventions are those that strengthen entire rural systems rather than addressing isolated challenges. International development partners should invest more strategically in rural infrastructure, financial inclusion, market access, digital connectivity, and value addition. Smallholder farmers can only benefit fully from increased production when they are linked to functioning markets and profitable value chains. Equally important is supporting women and young people, who consistently demonstrate strong potential to drive innovation, enterprise development, and community resilience when given access to skills, finance, and leadership opportunities. Development partners should also place greater emphasis on locally led development. Sustainable progress is achieved when communities, producer organizations, cooperatives, local governments, and private sector actors work together to identify priorities and implement solutions. Ultimately, rural transformation should not be measured solely by increased production or project outputs. Success should be reflected in stronger local economies, improved resilience to shocks, better employment opportunities, and an improved quality of life for rural populations.”

“International partners must now prioritize integrated approaches tailored to local realities. In northern Benin, investments should extend beyond traditional agriculture to also support rural entrepreneurship, agri-food processing, digital access, and community infrastructure. It is essential to strengthen the capacities of young people and women, who play a central role in rural economies. According to the African Development Bank, limited access to finance remains one of the main obstacles to rural entrepreneurship in West Africa. Technical and financial partners can therefore support innovative mechanisms for local financing, vocational training, and economic inclusion. Finally, rural development programs must be designed in collaboration with the communities themselves. Top-down solutions often produce limited impact. Sustainable rural transformation requires long-term investments, strengthened local governance, and better consideration of the climate, security, and social challenges specific to the rural areas of the Sahel and northern Benin.”

“Development partners, in close coordination with regional entities and the private sector, need to endorse a holistic multidisciplinary approach that will tackle the challenges mentioned above and will provide incentives to the rural population. That includes, first and foremost, transformation of SHFs from subsistence, rain-fed agriculture to market-oriented agriculture. That can be achieved by:

• settling the land tenure issues and providing land security to all, including men, women and youth;
• providing access to water through investment in bulk water infrastructure and power supply;
• providing access to markets through investment in roads;
• private sector can engage in providing better post-harvest and cold chain infrastructure and linkages to value chains and markets;
• facilitating investment in irrigation through subsidizing initial capital investment in infield systems, providing training and capacity building to SHFs on new commercial crops, irrigation and modern agricultural systems;
• promoting digital extension services;
• promoting bylaws for institutionalizing farmer organizations such as water user associations (WUAs) to make SHFs manage, be accountable and responsible, and ensure full cost recovery of operation and maintenance of their systems.”

“For meaningful transformation, international partners must foster decentralised development approaches with a clear focus on rural communities. The starting point is to support integrated rural programming, especially by building on synergies between economic empowerment and essential services such as water, energy, transportation, education, health, food security, and access to markets.”

“International development partners can play a stronger role by supporting rural industrialization, agro-processing, renewable energy access, digital connectivity, and smallholder integration into global supply chains. Beyond aid programs, rural transformation requires sustainable investment models that create jobs, strengthen local entrepreneurship, and improve long-term economic resilience in rural communities.”

“In my view, international development partners can support rural transformation most effectively by moving beyond short-term projects and focusing on sustainable rural economic systems. This means strengthening access to finance, supporting agribusiness development, improving market linkages, investing in rural infrastructure, and helping local institutions create an environment where private investment can flourish. Lasting rural development occurs when rural communities become economically connected, competitive, and capable of generating their own growth.”

See also: How can debt cancellation be structured to support the long-term development goals of developing countries? | Experts’ Opinions

According to the World Bank, three-quarters of the world’s poor live in rural areas and most earn their living from farming. Agriculture and rural development investments attract significant funding into agriculture, infrastructure, and local economies. That is why this sector does not lack opportunities for those looking to make a change. On the DevelopmentAid job board, there are currently 170+ openings in this sector, 4,600+ awarded tenders, and 70+ awarded grants for individual consultants. To gain access to this data, experts opt for the Individual Professional Membership, which also ensures increased exposure and many more valuable tools to land positions in international development.